B. C. David vs Crittenden David

Date: 6 Aug 1866 [unknown]
Location: Union Co., Kentucky, United States
Surnames/tags: David Lyon

These are transcriptions of court orders for the case B. C. David vs Crittenden David.

• 1866 B. C. David vs Crittenden David, Kentucky, Union County, County Court, Orders Vol. G, p. 406. Digital image 236 of 319, FamilySearch ([1]: accessed 10 February 2023)
  • ”August 6, 1866. B. C. David & others against Crittenden David & others. J.M. Waggoner app'd guardian a?liten for Crittenden Sallie & Geo David. Answer filed.

• 1866 B. C. David vs Crittenden David, Kentucky, Union County, County Court, Orders Vol. G, p. 408. Digital image 237 of 319, FamilySearch ([2]: accessed 10 February 2023)
  • ”August 6, 1866. Barilla C. David & others Ptffs vs. Crittenden David & others Defts. This cause coming on to be heard upon the petition tile papers filed service of process on the infant defendants Crittendon David, Sallie Daivd, & George David and the answer of the said infants by their guardian adlitem it is now ordered adjudged and decreed thath the real esatate owned by the Defts intestate Wm David at the time of his death as well in his own right as tenant in common with the plaintiff Huston Chapman and Hancock be partitioned and set apart as follows towit: Charles C. Buckman, Hull Higginson & Wm. J. Sugg or any two of them are appointed commissioners of this Court to execute this decree. They will proceed on the 7th day of August 1866 and continue from day to day even though it should require beyond the next term of this Court to view and examine the lands and lots in the petition mentioned and fix a fair cash value on each tract of land and each town lot and thence set apart to B. C. David the widow of said intestate for and during her natural life the on third part in and to said lands and in and to said lots quality and quantity considered. They will then divid the remainder of said land and lots into five equal parts quantity and quality considered and assign one lot to the Plaintiff Ruth E. Lyon one lot to the plaintiff Webster David and a lot to each of the defendants Crittendon Sallie and George David, and in the division of said lands and lots they may assign to the several parties their entire interest in one or more tracts of land and lots should they deem it to the interest of all parties. The said commissioners will by designated boundary divide the lands in the petition mentioned hee in coparcenary? as follows: The tract conveyed to Huston & David by Phillip and others into ten equal parts on ehalf thereof to Huston and the residue assign to the estate of William David having due regard to the quantity and quality of the land. The tract of 165 acres they will allot one half thereof to Chapman and the residue into ten equal parts assigning the one half thereof one fourth of the entire tract to Huston and the other jalf to the estate of Wm David quantity and quality considered and the tract of 100 acres conveyed by Ball they will allot Chapman the one half thereof and the one third of one half and to Huston & David's estate each the one third of one half with due regard to quantity and quality. The tract conveyed to Huston David & Chapman by Geigers heirs after deducting the land thereone conveyed to Porter Stone and William Ball they will divide into three equal parts quantity & quality considered and assign Chapman one third Huston one third and the estate of William David one third. The tract of land in Edmonson County they will divide into ten equal parts quantity and quality considered and assign John L. Hancock one half and the estate of Wm. David the reside thereof and report to this Court upon the completion of their labors."

• 1867 B. C. David vs Crittenden David, Kentucky, Union County, County Court, Orders Vol. G, p. 521. Digital image 293 of 319, FamilySearch ([3]: accessed 10 February 2023)
  • ”May 7, 1867. This day C C Buckman and Hull Higginson the cimmissioners appointed to divide the land and town lots mentioned and described in the petition returned into Court their report which was by the Court ordered to be filed and said over until the next term for exceptions until which time this cause is continued.

• 1867 B. C. David vs Crittenden David, Kentucky, Union County, County Court, Orders Vol. G, p. 541. Digital image 304 of 319, FamilySearch ([4]: accessed 10 February 2023)
  • ”June 4, 1867." The report returned into Court at the last term by C C Buckman and Hull Higginson two of the commissioners appointed to divide the land and town lots mentioned and described in the petition having laid over one month for exceptions and no exceptions having been taken thereto was by the Court examined and approved and ordered to be recorded and on motion of Plaintiffs attorney it is ordered that J M Waggener be and his is hereby appointed commissioner to convey to the several parties their respective interest as set apart to them by said commissioners and described in said report and this cause is continued until next term."

• 1867 B. C. David vs Crittenden David, Kentucky, Union County, County Court, Orders Vol. G, p. 548. Digital image 308 of 319, FamilySearch ([5]: accessed 10 February 2023)
  • ”July 1 4, 1867. "J M Waggener the cimmissioners appointed at the last term of this Court to convey to the parties their respective interests as allotted to them by C. C. Buckman and Hull Higginson comissioners according to their report which was approved at the last term of this court. This day produced to and in open court acknowledged deeds to the following parties viz Wm Davids Heirs to George Huston...which deeds were by the Court examined and approved and ordered to be certified for record. It is ordered that the commissioner be and he is hereby allowed until the next term of this court to execute deeds to Ruth C. Lyon and George David until which time this cause is continued."

• 1867 B. C. David vs Crittenden David, Kentucky, Union County, County Court, Orders Vol. H, p. 10. Digital image 35 of 357, FamilySearch ([6]: accessed 10 February 2023)
  • ”September 2, 1867. "This day J.M. Waggener the commissioner appointed heretofore herein appeared in open court and acknowledged deeds to George David & Ruth Lyon which deeds were by the Court examined and approved and ordered to be certified for record. It is ordered that this cause be dismissed except as to a division of cash herein."